TERMINOLOGICAL AND CONTENT CONTRADICTIONS
Abstract. The object of our exploration is some issues related to the definition of such concepts as “globalization”, “globalism”, “globalism”, “integration”, etc. The aim of the research article is an attempt to clarify some key aspects of this problem. The author of this paper is aiming to trace the attempts to find the necessary adequate terms for explaining the globalization processes in the modern sociological literature (in particular, in the works of Ulrich Beck). The methodological approach used here is comparison and analysis of various approaches to the definition of large-scale phenomena of the modern world. There is controversy with the definition of globalization processes by the contemporary Russian researcher E. Ustyugova. One of the most relevant problems seems to further scientific development and methodological elaboration of the scientific terminological dictionary of the sociology of globalization processes. This will allow to reach a better and higher level of scientific analysis in research of globalization processes.
Key words: globalization, globality, integration, globalism, theoretical and methodological crisis.
Imprint: Borodenko, O. V., 2017. “Hlobalizatsiia” – “intehratsiia” – “hlobalizm”: do pytannia pro neobkhidnist usunennia terminolohichnykh i zmistovnykh rozbizhnostei. Scientific World Journal, № 15, tom 4, s. 35-38.
See the full version of the article on the Ukrainian version of the site.